<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dixie Chicks can make people more innovative.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/</link>
	<description>Do I know you?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gia Lyons</title>
		<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Gia Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gialyons.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-509</guid>
		<description>Hey, Andrea! I thought the same thing, but then realized that all those consumer sites are public, and that I can usually decide whether to allow others to see my network in most of those sites. So, usecase isn&#039;t different here, it&#039;s just that I&#039;m giving permission to my trusted enterprise social network to see my conusmer social network, in a much easier way than them navigating to all those consumer sites and looking up my network that way.

Thanks, Tyler! I will fix now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Andrea! I thought the same thing, but then realized that all those consumer sites are public, and that I can usually decide whether to allow others to see my network in most of those sites. So, usecase isn&#8217;t different here, it&#8217;s just that I&#8217;m giving permission to my trusted enterprise social network to see my conusmer social network, in a much easier way than them navigating to all those consumer sites and looking up my network that way.</p>
<p>Thanks, Tyler! I will fix now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tylerpdx</title>
		<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>tylerpdx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gialyons.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Just a heads up, your link to Sam&#039;s blog at the bottom is broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a heads up, your link to Sam&#8217;s blog at the bottom is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gialyons.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-507</guid>
		<description>So I can see it now -- all those naysayers out there...&quot;It invades my privacy for you to show my likeness on your internal site&quot; or &quot;what if I don&#039;t want your friends to know about me?&quot; and the like.  So, there will have to be rules and governance, and the ability to &quot;opt out&quot; and all of a sudden, you&#039;ve taken away all the social aspects - and made it once again something not worth very much.

In theory, I think it&#039;s a great idea - in practice - I&#039;m wondering how ready we are, as a society.  Personally tho - I&#039;d love the conversations that start with &quot;have you heard this song by...&quot;.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I can see it now &#8212; all those naysayers out there&#8230;&#8221;It invades my privacy for you to show my likeness on your internal site&#8221; or &#8220;what if I don&#8217;t want your friends to know about me?&#8221; and the like.  So, there will have to be rules and governance, and the ability to &#8220;opt out&#8221; and all of a sudden, you&#8217;ve taken away all the social aspects &#8211; and made it once again something not worth very much.</p>
<p>In theory, I think it&#8217;s a great idea &#8211; in practice &#8211; I&#8217;m wondering how ready we are, as a society.  Personally tho &#8211; I&#8217;d love the conversations that start with &#8220;have you heard this song by&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Johnson</title>
		<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gialyons.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Tim Bray wrote an essay a couple weeks ago talking about this same problem but came up with a different solution:

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/05/05/Changing-Your-Address

Instead of us getting our data (ie: we can get our data out of linkedin), we should force websites to look for data in a single place so instead of you updating your image in 10 places, you&#039;d update your image in one place and then all the sites would see that change and update accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Bray wrote an essay a couple weeks ago talking about this same problem but came up with a different solution:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/05/05/Changing-Your-Address" rel="nofollow">http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2008/05/05/Changing-Your-Address</a></p>
<p>Instead of us getting our data (ie: we can get our data out of linkedin), we should force websites to look for data in a single place so instead of you updating your image in 10 places, you&#8217;d update your image in one place and then all the sites would see that change and update accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Big Always - Enterprise Data Portability needs a Reputation Standard</title>
		<link>http://gialyons.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/the-dixie-chicks-can-make-people-more-innovative/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Big Always - Enterprise Data Portability needs a Reputation Standard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gialyons.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-501</guid>
		<description>[...] Data Portability seems counterintuitive internally. Gia covers it well on her JiveTalks post and on her blog. Basically, there are all sorts of privacy and legal issues inside a company but it&#8217;s a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Data Portability seems counterintuitive internally. Gia covers it well on her JiveTalks post and on her blog. Basically, there are all sorts of privacy and legal issues inside a company but it&#8217;s a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
